Q&A Forum - December 2011

Screen 8 of 55

This rationing of my orgasms高潮 — the sexual climax, along with every other aspect of our new lifestyle, is based on our mutual consent, as it should be in every healthy relationship. This I understand well. My wife and I are fulfilling both of our natural desires, not just hers or mine. My uncertainty has to do with enforced chastity禁欲 — being kept from orgasm. If my wife and I agree that my orgasms高潮 — the sexual climax should be rationed and we both agree that her decisions in this regard shall go unchallenged, then it seems to me that the measure of my devotion as well as of her dominance is my consistent and increasingly painful dedication to submitting myself to her control. It seems to me that the use of a chastity禁欲 — being kept from orgasm devise would be evidence of a lack of commitment by the sub顺从者 — a submissive person, or a lack of trust by dominant woman. For example, I can't imagine that your husband would dare allow himself to have an orgasm高潮 — the sexual climax without your express permission even if he were not confined in a chastity belt贞操带 — a locked garment that blocks sex.

Or am I missing the point? Does the enforcement of chastity禁欲 — being kept from orgasm play a different role separate and apart from the mere rationing orgasms高潮 — the sexual climax, like a fetish恋物 — a strong sexual focus on one thing? Does the ability to keep her husband in chastity禁欲 — being kept from orgasm get the wife off even though she could have his compliance voluntarily? Do some husbands have a need to display an outward sign of their inward commitment? Or is it just that no man can be trusted to stick to his word?