Library Elise Sutton

Q&A Forum - September 2021 (The best of Elise)

Screen 16 of 36

On a personal note, I do know of a couple where the wife had the husband undertake this extreme step as the ultimate in permanent male chastity禁欲 — being kept from orgasm. The man had no negative health problems after his recovery from the surgery but he lives a life more or less as a eunuch while his wife enjoys a very healthy and active sex life with other partners, which was her goal. The husband has a career but when he is at home he is feminized and serves as his wife’s personal sissy伪娘 — a man dressed and treated as a girl maid女仆 — a woman servant. They engage in D&S sexual practices but he is not permitted sex with her and of course he is no longer able to have intercourse with a woman. It goes without saying that a penectomy to enforce permanent chastity禁欲 — being kept from orgasm is extreme FemDom女性支配 — female domination.

What is my take on this? I do not endorse this practice if the goal is permanent chastity禁欲 — being kept from orgasm. In fact, I am squeamish when it comes to this procedure. It seems to me to be unwise to undergo a permanent and unnecessary surgical procedure when there are other options available for permanent male chastity禁欲 — being kept from orgasm. True, permanent chastity禁欲 — being kept from orgasm devices can be cumbersome and intrusive but I think that is part of the fun and part of the mind game with male chastity禁欲 — being kept from orgasm. To know that a man’s penis阴茎 — the male sex organ is intact but under lock and key brings an entirely different psychological edge to FemDom女性支配 — female domination play. The woman knows that she can free her man’s member if she so chooses. This gives her enormous power.